“No Man’s Land”
Written by J. Knight-Adkin
|
NO
Man’s Land is an eerie sight
|
|
|
At
early dawn in the pale gray light.
|
|
|
Never
a house and never a hedge
|
|
|
In
No Man’s Land from edge to edge,
|
|
|
And
never a living soul walks there
|
|
|
To
taste the fresh of the morning air;—
|
|
|
Only
some lumps of rotting clay,
|
|
| That
were friends or foemen yesterday.
|
|
|
|
|
What
are the bounds of No Man’s Land?
|
|
|
You
can see them clearly on either hand,
|
|
|
A
mound of rag-bags gray in the sun,
|
|
|
Or
a furrow of brown where the earthworks run
|
|
|
From
the eastern hills to the western sea,
|
|
|
Through
field or forest o’er river and lea;
|
|
|
No
man may pass them, but aim you well
|
|
|
And
Death rides across on the bullet or shell.
|
|
|
|
|
But
No Man’s Land is a goblin sight
|
|
|
When
patrols crawl over at dead o’ night;
|
|
|
Boche
or British, Belgian or French,
|
|
|
You
dice with death when you cross the trench.
|
|
|
When
the “rapid,” like fireflies in the dark,
|
|
|
Flits
down the parapet spark by spark,
|
|
|
And
you drop for cover to keep your head
|
|
|
With
your face on the breast of the four months’ dead.
|
|
|
|
|
The
man who ranges in No Man’s Land
|
|
|
Is
dogged by the shadows on either hand
|
|
|
When
the star-shell’s flare, as it bursts o’erhead,
|
|
|
Scares
the gray rats that feed on the dead,
|
|
|
And
the bursting bomb or the bayonet-snatch
|
|
|
May
answer the click of your safety-catch,
|
|
|
For
the lone patrol, with his life in his hand,
|
|
|
Is
hunting for blood in No Man’s Land.
“No Man’s Land” was written by J Knight-Adkin. Knight had firsthand experience with World War
I trench warfare. He fought in the trenches for four months before he was
injured and sent to work at a prisoner of war camp. The first time I read “No
Man’s Land” it was for a history class. “No man’s land” was part of a group of
sources that had an overall Ally forces bias. This meant that all of them
talked about how horrid and despicable Germans were. So when I read the poem, I
was shocked and amazed that there was finally something that showed when it
comes to death all men are equal. But there is one line or one word that
differs from the idea of equality between men in battle. I didn’t even realize
what this one little word meant until I looked it up… With the true definition of
the word my whole equality in death analysis needed to be changed.
“No Man’s Land” has four stanza’s. Each stanza
has 8 lines and the rhyme scheme ABBCCDD.
The poem is easy to read through because of the rhyming couplets. Also
Knight uses simple but powerful descriptions to describe what ‘no man’s land’
is like. Oh also for those of you who do not know what ‘no man’s land” is, it
was the stretch of land between enemy trenches during World War I. It was
called this because soldiers who stepped on to no man’s land would usually die.
Knight uses vivid descriptions that show the
horror and monstrosity of trench warfare. In the first stanza the reader will
find that in trench warfare there are no bright mornings. No man’s land is
described as eerie, gray, and pale. Also the cloud of death hangs over the
strip of land, “And never a living soul walks there/ To taste the fresh of the
morning air;/ Only some lumps of rotting clay,/That were friends or foemen
yesterday.” We get a scene description and a soldier’s mentality in the first
stanza which allows us to feel emotion for those who have been lost to no man’s
land. The second stanza gives more description and reveals how impersonal
trench warfare is. A man can kill another man without even seeing him.
The third stanza is where the seemingly innocent
word is found: “Boche or British, Belgian or French,/ You dice with death when
you cross the trench.” When I first read these lines I thought, “oh how great
that he is telling the reader that everyone dies in war which then makes them
equal…” He represented men that were English, Belgian, French, and German. But
wait he does not say German… He uses the term “Boche” which happens to be a
derogatory word that was used during WWI towards German soldiers. It seems a
little unfair does it not??? He cheapens the death of German soldiers by
calling them a derogatory term… So therefore apparently everyone else is equal
in death…except the Germans.
The rest of the poem describes what sounds fills
the trenches when there is an attack. Also the horrors of battle are brought to
center fold with Knight’s vivid details. Now this poem is still and excellent
WWI poem because it delves into the mind of a soldier who has seen the horrors
trench war fare and how the fighting almost seemed futile. But this poem really
shows how something can seem like it represents all parties of an event. But in
reality it makes one of the parties seem less human.
|
|
I like the way that understanding the meaning of just one word more deeply can change your reading of a text.
ReplyDeleteI haven't read this poem or heard of the poet before; I tried to do a little research, but there really isn't much out there on him. This is a good poem in terms of the complexity with which the writer deals with war; it strikes me as a fairly weak poem, though, in terms of poetic conventions or in comparison to the poems of the more anthologized WWI poets. What do you think?
Yeah there is little information on the author and poem online. I havn't read many WWI poems but the ones you showed us in class are way different than this one. I think he was just a soldier who wrote down some thoughts about the atrocity of war in poetic form. He did have it published but i havnt found any information on him to say what he did with the rest of his life.
ReplyDeleteYou did a great job with this blog. I read the poem and really enjoyed it but I basically shared your experience, word by word. I totally interpretted the poem as one of equality in the chaos of war and skipped over the word "Boche." I didn't give it much thought until you brought it up. Seeing the title of your blog, I was trying to look for something unexpected or out of place as far as a word or phrase goes but "Boche" didn't really hit me at first. Once you brought it up, I totally agreed with you. It definitely does say something about the power one word or phrase can have on a poem, it's meaning and interpretation. I always do research for my blogs and this is a prime example of how valueable research can be when explicating a poem. Great Job!
ReplyDeleteIt is a wonderful poem, isn't it? And I love how you found out that the poem is about the equality of men in death. Guess that why it's called "No Man's Land!" (I probably should've picked up on that during my first read-through, huh?) Anyway, great blog! And hurray on finding a subject that ISN'T on the two poems she suggested. :) This is a nice change of pace!
ReplyDelete